AYEDNICOLE

By AyeDNicole | October 13, 2026

Personal Account | Life Experiences | Legal Qualitative Reviews

Another Police Call After October 8, 2026

Following the police-related concerns that began on October 8, 2026, another police contact was made involving my parents. This comes after Temple Terrace Police Department officers had already spoken with me on October 10, 2026.

During that October 10 conversation, officers were respectful, maintained appropriate boundaries, and did not identify any immediate signs of violence or harm. No arrest occurred.

According to the conversation relayed to me through my parents, Temple Terrace Police acknowledged that it sounded as though I was being antagonized.

What concerns me is why my family continues to be contacted when officers have already spoken with me and the previous interaction ended peacefully.

I believe this pattern deserves proper documentation, particularly because I have publicly discussed my experiences involving alleged defamation, harassment, social media monitoring, and personal conflicts.

Individuals Whose Potential Involvement I Want Documented

The following individuals are people whose previous interactions with me have raised concerns. Their inclusion does not establish that they made either police call, coordinated a report, or committed a crime. I am identifying them for purposes of documenting my concerns and requesting that any relevant evidence be evaluated.

• Michael Jenkins Jr. — Jacksonville, Florida: I have previously raised concerns regarding his associations with DJ Shab, Tokyo Jetz, and Tia Coleman. I have also questioned his social media references to Young Dolph, his time in Memphis around the period of Dolph’s death, and his later Jacksonville club affiliations. These concerns do not establish involvement in either police report.
• Tia Coleman — Jacksonville, Florida: I have documented personal conflicts dating back to 2009 and concerns about social media activity. Her mother is reportedly a former Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office officer. I question whether anyone with law enforcement knowledge could be advising others on how to initiate welfare concerns, but I have no verified evidence that her mother has done so.
• Shauntrell Griffin, professionally known as Tokyo Jetz: I previously documented a statement I attribute to her involving the words, “George Floyd that ass.” Given the seriousness of that language, I believe the context and any available recording should be preserved and evaluated.
• Alja Jackson: I am including this name among individuals whose potential relevance I want documented, without alleging a verified connection to the calls.
• Rique Bentley — Jacksonville, Florida: I observed activity involving an older video in which I addressed what I considered defamatory statements about me. The video was not violent. I want the interaction preserved as part of my broader documentation.

• Jasmine Herbert — Apopka, Florida: I have previously described disputes involving a brand name, social media activity, police contact, and a court proceeding at which I state she did not appear. I continue to dispute her conduct, but her involvement in this additional police contact has not been established.

• Camille Baker and her mother: I have video from approximately October 7–8 that I interpret as suggesting the possibility of police involvement. This followed my public discussion encouraging parents to protect their children and understand potential misconduct within Greek-letter organizations. I question whether those interactions were intended to provoke or intimidate me, although the video alone does not establish a coordinated or false police report.

Additional Individuals With Military Connections

Bethany Larson: I have experienced personal conflict involving this individual and want any relevant communications reviewed before drawing conclusions.

Chris Chris Parker: I have concerns about online interactions and attention to my social media despite her being stationed elsewhere. I would like any documented communications evaluated for potential harassment.

I am not presenting any of these individuals as confirmed callers or criminal suspects. Identifying the actual reporting parties requires official records or other reliable evidence.

Why Jacksonville Remains a Significant Concern

Jacksonville, Florida, continues to stand out in my personal documentation because several longstanding disputes and experiences originated there.

My concerns involving Tia Coleman date back to 2009. I have also publicly addressed my experiences involving Michael Jenkins Jr., Rique Bentley, and the incident involving Tokyo Jetz.

I believe the history and chronology of these interactions are important. However, I also recognize that someone’s social relationships, employment history, family connections to law enforcement, or affiliations within the entertainment industry do not independently prove misconduct.

My concern is whether individuals with longstanding grievances are attempting to use police welfare reports or other official processes to continue personal disputes.

That is a question for evidence and appropriate authorities to determine.

Temple Terrace Police and the October 10 Interaction

One important distinction must be made: my experience with Temple Terrace Police was respectful.

During the October 10 interaction, I discussed my music, my businesses, my personal expression, and my concerns. The officers did not arrest me, and the conversation concluded without incident.

I was subsequently informed that police had communicated with my parents and that the possibility of me being antagonized was discussed.

I understand that police must assess reports they receive, including genuine concerns for someone’s welfare. At the same time, reports should not become tools for retaliation, intimidation, or ongoing personal conflict.

I also discussed my music and entertainment interests, including Paper Route Empire, 4HIO Label, Heavy On It, and Fenty Corp. These references concern my artistic interests, business positioning, and proposed professional relationships. They should not be misconstrued as evidence of violent intent or criminal activity.

My understanding of the subsequent contact is that officers did not return to interview me after the earlier peaceful interaction. I do not interpret that alone as a formal finding about the legality or truthfulness of anyone’s report.

The October 7–8 Video and My Concerns About Premeditation

I have retained video from the October 7–8 timeframe involving Camille Baker’s mother.

I interpreted statements and behavior in that video as suggesting police might be called before any subsequent police contact occurred.

To me, that timing raises questions about whether a paper trail was being created to portray me as an aggressor after I publicly defended myself.

A concern about premeditation is not the same as proof of premeditation.

That is precisely why I believe the video, timestamps, social media communications, and police records should be reviewed together rather than relying on assumptions about anyone’s intentions.

I also believe any legitimate inquiry should distinguish between a person expressing strong opinions, an actual threat, and a caller reporting a genuine safety concern.

Freedom of Expression Is Not Probable Cause

I am a multifaceted woman. I work in business, create music, operate brands, write articles, and speak publicly about my experiences.

Being outspoken does not automatically make someone violent.

Being a rapper does not automatically make someone dangerous.

Having personal disagreements does not automatically establish probable cause for an arrest.

And defending myself publicly does not mean that another person’s interpretation of my words is necessarily accurate.

At the same time, every report must be evaluated on its actual facts. I support legitimate law enforcement intervention when there is a genuine safety concern.

What I oppose is the intentional fabrication or manipulation of reports to punish someone for speaking.

My Message to Parents, Law Enforcement, and the Community

My parents should not have to become participants in ongoing personal disputes simply because I choose to write about my experiences.

It appears people who have deceased parents or not a good relationship with their parents are passively aggressive in jealousy and malicious attempts to be nasty towards me who they don’t like because I come from a good home. They’re mad at themselves.

I encourage parents to ask questions, preserve communications, and verify information before accepting someone else’s portrayal of their adult children.

I also encourage individuals who believe police reporting systems are being abused to preserve evidence and pursue appropriate complaint procedures rather than escalating confrontations online.

I intend to document the relevant names, dates, videos, communications, and available incident records through appropriate channels.

I want accountability based on facts, not assumptions.

Final Statement: My Voice Will Not Be Misrepresented

I will continue to exercise my freedom of expression, operate my businesses, pursue my music, and discuss my personal experiences.

I appreciate the respectful interaction I experienced with Temple Terrace Police on October 10, 2026.

I also expect my family’s privacy and peace to be respected.

If anyone has knowingly made false reports, coordinated harassment, or attempted to manipulate law enforcement against me, I believe those actions should be investigated based on credible evidence.

“You do not get to turn my creativity, my business ambition, my voice, or my family’s peace into a weapon against me. I can be outspoken, educated, expressive, and still be a law-abiding woman. My family deserves peace, and I deserve to have the facts evaluated fairly.”

— AyeDNicole

Editor’s Note: This article is a first-person account of the author’s reported experiences, observations, and concerns. References to named individuals are not findings of criminal conduct, participation in police calls, or coordinated wrongdoing. Statements attributed to law enforcement reflect the author’s understanding of the conversations and have not been independently verified through official reports. Professional entertainment affiliations discussed in this article should not be interpreted as confirmed contractual relationships or endorsements.